Rating the Conferences: EA

The second conference of Day 1.  This isn't quite as....light as it should be.





Rating: D+

(I apologize in advance for my ranting.  But I don't think I can get through this without losing my shit.  Ready?  3...2....)

What even was this?!  I joked when they started the show off with Mass Effect: Andromeda (which I'll get to in a moment), that it was all downhill from there.  I had no idea how wrong I was.  As much as Microsoft improved on an already good conference from 2014, EA found a way to make an already crap conference from last year worse.  They took shit mountain and decided to shovel it all over us.

I mean, make fun of 2014 EA all you want, but at least they were talking about games.   Sim City, Mass Effect (I'm still coming back to this), Dragon Age, some new Bioware IP, Criterion's stuff, etc. etc...   This year they just came out there with NOTHING and expected us to be entertained with it. 
For starters, Mass Effect was a disappointment.  How long has this game been in the works?  I've been hearing people tease about it forever--they mentioned it last year at E3, so I figured we'd get a blowout.   Gamers complain about CG teasers but those aren't that bad--they don't show off game play but they give an idea of the look and feel of the characters and universe.   This basically just traded on the fact that people love the Mass Effect series and just really wanted to go back to that universe.  If you're a newbie like me who's just thinking about giving it a chance, it didn't show or tell you anything.   Hell, THAT WASN'T EVEN THE MAIN CHARACTER.   I really want them to have more to show between now and the oh-so-important "N7", because this has been cooking a long time.

After getting our preface of nothing out of the way, they shifted to the Need 4 Speed remake.  It looked good, and I'll give them props for making an honest attempt to bring that franchise back to its former prominence.    But afterwards they started in with SPORTS and y'know what...

I honestly don't get it.   I mean, I know sports games sell well.  In fact, unless you're a dudebro who lives off Call of Duty, GTA, and little to NOTHING else--they outsell literally every game you like, possibly combined.   So I understand them putting money into these games.  But who are they advertising them to at these shows?  Madden, NBA Live, NHL, and certainly FIFA--are all going to sell amounts measured in "fucktons" every year, to people who already know roughly when the game is going to come out anyway.   I get commercials.  I get pre-order bonuses.  But when EA pops up with 30 minutes of SPORTS for a show that's only an hour, I'm totally lost as to exactly who it's for, save for allowing the developers to show off on the big stage alongside the others.

But even that wasn't the worst.   The worst was bringing soccer legend Pele on stage to sit down with for what felt like decades.  And the thing is: it's not that the guy isn't worth talking to.  This would've made a GREAT YouTube segment to put on EA's channel in order to promote FIFA.  But it had no place on the big stage.  Sony won't ever have to worry about people mocking them for "Powers" again, because this definitely topped that.

They capped the conference off with Mirror's Edge and Star Wars: Battlefront, which was decent enough in that it made a return, but essentially confirmed for me that neither were titles I wanted.   EA has so many other games in the works that it’s strange they came so unprepared, for a second year in a row.  The bar was set pretty low for Ubisoft after this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sage Spoils The Plot: Kamen Rider Decade

Image
Starting a new section today, entitled Sage Spoils The Plot. I pondered over this name for quite a while, but as I thought about it, I realized calling it commentary or blogging or whatever is just bullshit. What you're REALLY doing is spoiling the plot and adding your own brand of shitty humor. So, why not be honest? Plus, Sage Spoils The Plot has kind of a ring to it. For the first section we're doing the new Kamen Rider series of 2009, Kamen Rider Decade. Kamen Rider checks a lot of "totally fucking awesome" boxes for me. A lot of people might call it, "Japanese Power Rangers" (which is untrue from the start since that already exists) due to the suits and the fight scenes. I accept this. That said, its proof that anything done right can be cool--so when you get rid of the over-acting, toss in a good plot (exceptionally good plots actually), add in some well done characterization, and tone down the stupid-level of the fight scenes and make them look less l
Read more

The New 52, Corrected: Justice Legion A

Image
What Happened: It’s another replacement book.  This time we’re getting rid of Legion Lost.  What I’d Change: Enjoy the adventures of the Justice League of the 853rd century.  Why: Put simply?  Legion Lost didn’t have enough legs to function as an ongoing series.  A group of the Legion’s best members go to the past to combat an alien virus...and then what.  They get stuck?  Meh.  The appeal of the Legion is they’re from the future.  This could have been a great MINI-series; something with a beginning, a middle, and an end.  As an ongoing I got bored, really fast.  So instead let’s replace them with a book about the Justice League of the far future. DC's got a terrible habit of making up awesome concepts and then leaving them by the wayside, this is one of DC’s greatest and its only been revisited like, twice.  (Once by Geoff Johns with Booster Gold 1,000,000 and once with Chris Roberson with some Superman/Batman comic.)   It helps lighten the hit that came with Flashpoint
Read more